Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWang, Jianen_US
dc.contributor.authorMiletic, Hrvojeen_US
dc.contributor.authorSakariassen, Per Øysteinen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuszthy, Peter Csabaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJacobsen, Hegeen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrekkå, Narveen_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xingangen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Pengen_US
dc.contributor.authorMørk, Sverreen_US
dc.contributor.authorChekenya, Marthaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBjerkvig, Rolfen_US
dc.contributor.authorEnger, Per Øyvinden_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-27T15:44:59Z
dc.date.available2015-01-27T15:44:59Z
dc.date.issued2009-12-29eng
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/9296
dc.description.abstractBackground: Establishing clinically relevant animal models of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains a challenge, and many commonly used cell line-based models do not recapitulate the invasive growth patterns of patient GBMs. Previously, we have reported the formation of highly invasive tumour xenografts in nude rats from human GBMs. However, implementing tumour models based on primary tissue requires that these models can be sufficiently standardised with consistently high take rates. Methods: In this work, we collected data on growth kinetics from a material of 29 biopsies xenografted in nude rats, and characterised this model with an emphasis on neuropathological and radiological features. Results: The tumour take rate for xenografted GBM biopsies were 96% and remained close to 100% at subsequent passages in vivo, whereas only one of four lower grade tumours engrafted. Average time from transplantation to the onset of symptoms was 125 days ± 11.5 SEM. Histologically, the primary xenografts recapitulated the invasive features of the parent tumours while endothelial cell proliferations and necrosis were mostly absent. After 4-5 in vivo passages, the tumours became more vascular with necrotic areas, but also appeared more circumscribed. MRI typically revealed changes related to tumour growth, several months prior to the onset of symptoms. Conclusions: In vivo passaging of patient GBM biopsies produced tumours representative of the patient tumours, with high take rates and a reproducible disease course. The model provides combinations of angiogenic and invasive phenotypes and represents a good alternative to in vitro propagated cell lines for dissecting mechanisms of brain tumour progression.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0eng
dc.titleA reproducible brain tumour model established from human glioblastoma biopsiesen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2013-08-28T16:38:16Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2009 Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd
dc.rights.holderJian Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.source.articlenumber465
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-465
dc.identifier.cristin342694
dc.source.journalBMC Cancer
dc.source.409


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY