Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStrandenes, Eivind
dc.contributor.authorEllison, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMølster, Anders
dc.contributor.authorGjerdet, Nils Roar
dc.contributor.authorMoldestad, Irene Ohlen
dc.contributor.authorHøl, Paul Johan
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-23T08:11:03Z
dc.date.available2021-04-23T08:11:03Z
dc.date.created2020-08-10T14:23:57Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2020, 1-5.
dc.identifier.issn1753-1934
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2739268
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to compare side-to-side with step-cut repairs to determine how much of the width it is possible to remove and still keep the repair strong enough to start active mobilization. Porcine flexor tendons were used to create side-to-side, one-third step-cut and half step-cut repairs. There were 15 repairs in each group. The tensile properties of the constructs were measured in a biomechanical testing machine. All repairs failed by the sutures splitting the tendon longitudinally. The maximum load and stiffness were highest in the side-to-side group. Our findings suggest that the half step-cut repair can withstand the forces exerted during active unrestricted movement of the digits in tendons of this size. The advantage of the step-cut repair is reduced bulkiness and less friction, which might compensate for the difference in strength.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSageen_US
dc.titleStrength of side-to-side and step-cut repairs in tendon transfers: biomechanical testing of porcine flexor tendonsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1753193420939068
dc.identifier.cristin1822533
dc.source.journalJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1061-1065en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2020, 45(10): 1061-1065en_US
dc.source.volume45en_US
dc.source.issue10en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel