The systemic metabolic profile early after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Effects of adequate energy support administered through enteral feeding tube
Tvedt, Tor Henrik Anderson; Skaarud, Kristin Aneta Joan; Tjønnfjord, Geir Erland; Gedde-Dahl, Tobias; Iversen, Per Ole; Bruserud, Øystein
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Published version

Åpne
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2755851Utgivelsesdato
2020Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
- Department of Clinical Science [2502]
- Registrations from Cristin [11365]
Originalversjon
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2020, 26(2), 380-391 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.10.005Sammendrag
Patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation usually require nutritional support. There is no consensus on whether enteral support through tube feeding should be preferred. A recent randomized study could not detect any difference between enteral and parenteral feeding with regard to post-transplant outcomes, whereas 2 retrospective studies described an association between enteral feeding and a favorable post-transplant outcome. We compared pre- and post-transplant plasma metabolomic profiles for 10 patients receiving mainly enteral nutritional support and 10 patients receiving mainly parenteral support. Samples were collected before conditioning and 3 weeks post-transplant; 824 metabolites were analyzed using mass spectrometry. The pretransplant metabolite profiles showed a significant overlap between the 2 groups. Post-transplant samples for both patient groups showed an increase of secondary bile acids and endocannabinoids, whereas reduced levels were seen for food preservatives, plasmalogens, and retinol metabolites. The main post-transplant differences between the groups were decreased levels of fatty acids and markers of mitochondrial activation in the control group, indicating that these patients had insufficient energy intake. A significant effect was also seen for heme/bilirubin metabolism for the parenteral support. To conclude, allotransplant recipients showed altered metabolic profiles early after transplantation; this was mainly due to the conditioning/transplantation/reconstitution, whereas the type of nutritional support had minor effects.