Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNøkleby, Kjersti
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Tore Julsrud
dc.contributor.authorMdala, Ibrahimu
dc.contributor.authorTran, Anh Thi
dc.contributor.authorBakke, Åsne
dc.contributor.authorGjelsvik, Bjørn E.
dc.contributor.authorClaudi, Tor
dc.contributor.authorCooper, John
dc.contributor.authorLøvaas, Karianne Fjeld
dc.contributor.authorThue, Geir
dc.contributor.authorSandberg, Sverre
dc.contributor.authorJenum, Anne Karen
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-31T08:18:26Z
dc.date.available2021-05-31T08:18:26Z
dc.date.created2021-01-12T08:41:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.PublishedPrimary Care Diabetes. 2020, 1-7.
dc.identifier.issn1751-9918
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2756981
dc.description.abstractAims To explore variation in general practitioners’ (GPs’) performance of six recommended procedures in type 2 diabetes patients <75 years without cardiovascular disease. Methods Cross-sectional study of quality of diabetes care in Norway based on electronic health records from 2014. GPs (clustered in practices) were divided in quintiles based on a composite measure of performance of six processes of care. We fitted a multilevel partial ordinal regression model to identify GP factors associated with being in quintiles with better performance. Results We identified 6015 type 2 diabetes patients from 275 GPs in 77 practices. The GPs performed on average 63.4% of the procedures; on average 46% in the poorest quintile to 81% in the best quintile with a larger range in individual GPs. After adjustments, use of a structured follow-up form was associated with GPs being in upper three quintiles (OR 12.4 (95% CI 2.37–65.1). Routines for reminders were associated with being in a better quintile (OR 2.6 (1.37–4.92). GPs’ age >60 years and heavier workload were associated with poorer performance. Conclusion We found large variations in GPs’ performance of processes of care. Factors reflecting structure and workload were strongly associated with performance.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleVariation between general practitioners in type 2 diabetes processes of careen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pcd.2020.11.018
dc.identifier.cristin1869512
dc.source.journalPrimary Care Diabetesen_US
dc.source.pagenumber495-501en_US
dc.identifier.citationPrimary Care Diabetes. 2021, 15(3), 495-501en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.issue3en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal