• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Humanities
  • Department of Philosophy
  • Department of Philosophy
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Humanities
  • Department of Philosophy
  • Department of Philosophy
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Scorekeeping

Antonsen, Pål Fjeldvig
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Accepted version
Thumbnail
View/Open
Accepted version (183.4Kb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1956/22094
Date
2018
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Department of Philosophy [204]
Original version
https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx145
Abstract
An influential suggestion from David Lewis is that we should think of assertions in terms of how they affect the conversational score. This note outlines a way to model conversational scores in such a way that two assertoric effects are brought together: that to assert is to propose to add information to the common ground, and that to assert is to undertake commitments. Rather than being seen as rivals, they should be viewed as complementary descriptions of our practises of making assertions.
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Journal
Analysis
Copyright
Copyright 2018 The Author(s). All rights reserved

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit